| Message: |
This is interesting! Couple of things. I agree with Hanna that it should be based on whether he intended or thought he was being racist. Unfortunately, my (limited) understanding of Race Law says that it is not the intention of the 'perpetrator' but the opinion of the 'victim' that designates whether or not a Racially motivated crime or incident has taken place. For example, my husband is African and if he were to be mugged in the street and the mugger - let's say he's not a black man - says "give me your phone, Ni***", then if my husband feels he was mugged BECAUSE he is black, this is not just a mugging but also turns into a hate crime too, for which the penalties can I believe be higher. This is the problem we have in this country. It is not easy to 'prove' your intention, either as the defendant or the prosecution (or as Anton du Beke and the BBC!). This is why it falls on the 'victim' and the victim's feelings of being racially abused. In this case, it was clearly a stupid and insensitive comment to make to Ms Rouass. Not only because it is not acceptable to use such racial epithets, even as a joke, but also because as a public figure he is supposed to be held to a higher standard, especially when he knows he is being filmed for a family TV show! In response to Bumfy, I completely agree with you that there are different standards being applied here as were applied to Carol Thatcher. I start by saying I don't particularly like her (or her mohter!) but if I remember correctly, she did not say that the player was a Golliwog, but that his or her hairstyle reminded her of the Golliwogs that used to be on Robertson's jam when she was young. She was referring to a cartoon character on a jar of jam, that also happens to be an unpleasant racial epithet. She was silly and foolish to say it, but it was in a private conversation, off-air and was, to my mind, far less offensive that calling someone a 'P*k*' while being filmed by the BBC. To my mind, he is perceived as 'more valuable' to the BBC than she was and so they'll save him whilst they happily threw her overboard (I guess there were probably other reasons too for sacking her, but these are not made public - that is my guess, anyway). Personally, I think that we really need to spend time as a nation dealing with ACTUAL racism, and not walking in step with the 'Political Correctness Police' at the expense of real social problems, as people are too afraid to state what problems there actually are in our society at risk of being called racist, or some such other Hate Crime.
|