|
Today I've received the letter from the consultant, as she promised. It's very long, and is mainly a recap of the appointment, but two things stand out: "...your baby's measurements were over and above the highest centile on the chart. There was definitely an indication for firstly repeating the glucose test to ensure you had not developed diabetes later on in the pregnancy and also to refer you for a review by one of the obstetricians." "...there is a strong chance that you and your husband would have a baby of either the equivalent size or slightly larger... I think it would be reasonable to consider a planned caesarian section at 39 weeks." So firstly there is a proper admission, and it's recorded officially in a letter, that the midwives should have done another GTT and should also have referred me to the obstetrician, and secondly that having a baby of that size I shouldn't have gone overdue and I should have been offered an elective c-section. I am also pleased that I've asked for a copy of my notes (I think... still a bit apprehensive about having it there in black and white to read though...) because what I'd been told verbally was that I never got past 3cm, but in the letter it states I got to 4cm - information which the consultant would have got from my notes. I'm also still not entirely sure what DS's initial apgar score was... I know it was low (I'm fairly certain they said it was 4) but I still don't know 100%. A copy has been sent to my GP so at least she'll know exactly what I'm talking about if I need to see her about it in due course. Still not really sure how I feel about it all... I mean I seemed to cope okay yesterday when two friends on two different occasions asked about the birth and I was able to discuss it, but it was afterwards and when I was alone that I then struggled to deal with it again. Gadgebot xx

|