|
Hello ladies,
I know this board is fairly quiet but i wanted to introduce myself. I'm 30 DH is 28, we've been together 5 years and are both teachers. We have unexplained infertility and a birth child looks unlikely without intervention.
Two years into our relationship we considered adoption, but after several conversations decided to put the process on hold and seriously try for our own birth child following up on investigations and getting help for our infertility. In Feb of this year after discovering we had a fertilisation problem we decided to postponed further treatment for a birth child and to look into adoption again (the need / want to adopt never really went away for either of us).
Everything i've read and adoption workers i have spoken to, had talked about time after fertility treatment to grieve the fact that we can't have a birth child and wait 6 moths before we register. I completely understand this policy...but i haven't dismissed having a birth child at a later date......this of course may well change when (if) we are accepted for adoption and have our child(ren) living with us. People that have birth children sometimes adopt then have more birth children don't they....so why is it presumed / isinuated that people with infertility wont go on to have intervention after adopting?
Why is it percieved to be bad to want to adopt and have more children later? We want to adopt because we feel we have alot to offer. We are not necessarily wanting babies / toddlers, are quite open to adopting a family group and have the space to do so. Adopion has ever been a second option for us...something we have always wanted to do with or without BC.
Your thoughts? Love Em x
|