|
Hmm, toughie. I don't really follow 'celebville', but you'd have to be living in a cave not to hear about K&P. Here are my thoughts... Was her night out the final boundry for Pete? I don't know what was going on behind the scenes, who does apart from them two. Sometimes relationships just sort of break down and people drift apart, but sometimes there is just that 'one thing' that brings everything to a head. I think this night out was his. And is it really possible to move on from a marriage in 8 weeks, as Kate says she has done? I don't know the answer to that one, everyone's different after all. She doesn't seem like the sort of person who would sit crying into her pillow at night, maybe she's just coping the best way she knows how - by getting on with things. If they were having significant problems perhaps they'd already 'emotionally' split from each other. For example, I was with an abusive partner for a time, and although it took me some time to leave I knew months before I actually made the break that I wanted out. For me, breaking up with him just wasn't a big deal, because in my mind I'd already dealt with it and thought through the possible consequences and aftermath. Maybe she'd already considered the possibility on some level that this might happen. Maybe she's just putting up a front, maybe she's not really over it at all despite everything she said. That's a lot of assumptions I'm making :) Could being so self-reliant, financially secure etc, make it easier to let go? I think the answer would have to be yes. Not having to worry about paying the bills, where you're going to live etc etc mean you can focus more on your own emotional well being, knowing that at least in the 'practical' sense, you'll be okay. Does walking away from infidelity/marriage problems, become less of a worry if you have loads and loads of your own money? I don't think it would hurt less emotionally, but as I said above practically it means there's just far less to worry about. If you agree with your partner not to go out clubbing, and then go ahead and do it, have you actually made an error in judgement or have you knowingly forced your partners hand? I think asking your partner to never go out without you again is pretty unreasonable in all honesty. Putting that aside, people shouldn't have to change themselves totally in a relationship. Clubbing is very much part of K's 'image' and 'lifestyle', he must have known that before he married her. Asking her not to do it would be like asking her to never pose topless again. That's just the way she is in a sense. She shouldn't have agreed to it, but lots of us have made the mistake of telling our partners what they want to hear in instances where we are desperate to make things work. I can see P's side too, she promised not to do something and did it, but I think they should have both realised that when you get to the stage where there is so little trust you don't want your partner to ever go out without you, things need fixing. IMO even if K had never gone out again, I don't really think that would've 'solved' any of their problems, I just think the focus would've just shifted onto different areas. Can any similarity be drawn from a *celeb* relationship and a *normal* one? I suppose the emotions involved are exactly the same no matter who you're dating, but I can't help feeling that a 'celeb' relationship would be easier in some respects. Such as, never having to worry about paying the bills, cleaning the house, working overtime to pay the bills so you never see each other. I think it would be less to worry about and (in theory at least!) easier to see each other and spend 'quality time' together. Having said that, it must be difficult to have your every move photographed and commented on, but then again you can't court the press only on your terms. You either back out of public life as much as is possible or you let it penetrate every aspect in your life. In some respects that was they choice they made. Hmm, in summary, I can't seem to make up my mind! :)
|