|
HI there I'm no expert in this area and I think you should get in touch with the HR department at your employer's, explain how confused you are and ask for an explanation in writing of the situation as it stands. Then, if it's still unclear you are able to take advice (from your union or a solicitor) on the basis of something that is written down in black and white. From what you say, it sounds to me like the situation is that the GP has said you are fit to work and the OH (is this OH at your own work or an external NHS OH?) has also said you are fit to work, but only with support if it is to be in your current role. Your employers have said this is unworkable (I suspect they will have to state why, or risk a case of unfair dismissal if it came to that) and are therefore looking at alternatives to ensure you remain in employment. My question to you is whether YOU think you are fit to work in this job or not as you don't say? You also don't say whether it was you that requested you stayed off work until the OH had assessed or whether this was at the request of your employer or your GP. If you are sure you are not fit to work in this job, then in my view you should go back to your GP to get signed off sick. If you think you are fit to work in this job then you can simply decide to go back to work and see how you get on. If you find you are not fit to do so then you would go back to your GP to be signed off sick. My understanding of SSP is that it is paid out if you either self-cert your sickness, or have a sicknote from your doctor - otherwise it doesn't get paid (I may not be right though, so don't take my word for it). You can only self-cert for 3 days so if you are too sick to work you will need to get the sick note if you want this pay. It is normal that occupational sick pay doesn't pay out on the never-never. I think at my company we get one month of full pay (including the SSP bit) and then one month on half pay and then nothing - and that's generous!! I'm not sure about the re-deployment. You say that it's a temporary redeployment and they are keeping your role open for you so you can have a review of your illness in 6 months time, which sounds reasonable and fair to me. I wouldn't have thought that suitable redeployment has to be on the same salary , I would think they simply have to pay a fair salary for the role you are doing for them. You don't say what you do or how different the alternative role is, but I would imagine the role would have to be quite different if you're not able to do your current one, and therefore it doesn't sound unreasonable that it's on a different salary. Eiher way, If you are not well enough to do the role you used to do, then between you you have to decide how to move forward. It sounds like your options are: Decide to go back to your old role and see whether you are capable of doing it. Push your employer to find out why it's not possible to support you in your old role and try to negotiate from there. If they have a good reason, then accept that isn't an option. But see if you can get them to keep you on some kind of pay - even if it's half pay - until the new role becomes available in October (on the basis you won't be able to sign-on in that time either) Take the temporary alternative role at the lower salary with the aim of being fit enough to return to your old role in 6 months after a review Take the temporary alternative role, but start looking for a new job at a higher salary that you know you are fit to do. Whatever the legal situation, not working at all and continuing to be paid your full salary isn't likely to be an option unless your doctor signs you off on long-term sick and your company has very generous long-term sick pay policies. Hope you get this sorted soon - I'd be interested to see how it pans out so please do post to let us know! Jo x
|